Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit

Why you should ditch Norton AntiVirus

Robert Vamosi CNET

Published: 08 Nov 2004

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment
Why you should ditch Norton AntiVirus

Every year, I take a look at the latest crop of antivirus software. Usually, the new versions of these programs are just the same software packages in a new box with the current year on it. This year, however, I saw a demo for an application that had me running home to install it and raving about it to friends and family. Trend Micro's PC-cillin Internet Security 12 (2005) is the best antivirus software package I've seen in a long while. Give it a try; I think you'll agree.

Under the surface, antivirus programs are basically the same
For £40 or so, no matter which program you buy, you're investing in antivirus software that includes a scanner engine and a year's worth of signature-file updates. You need the updates to identify the latest viruses and worms, and most antivirus programs now automatically download the updates behind the scenes, so you don't have to worry about it. The engines themselves match patterns -- that is, they look at files on your hard drive and compare them to the signature files you just downloaded. If there's a match, the suspect file goes into quarantine, a protected folder on your hard drive where it can't hurt your system (again, this too has been automated so that you hardly even notice this process). Lately, antivirus programs have added heuristics -- the ability to sense a new virus or worm before a signature file has been downloaded based on malicious behaviour. Also, most antivirus software will check both incoming and outgoing email messages for signs of infection. The differences, then, lie in the nuances of these applications. How much of your system resources do they hog? How fast or how often does the vendor release its signature-file updates? And what additional features does the software offer?

Norton AntiVirus 2005
My annual complaints about Norton AntiVirus, the industry leader, are as follows: Symantec's telephone technical support is very expensive (£18 per live support incident), and Norton AntiVirus traditionally slows all but the fastest PCs. And what's really new about it? I'm sorry to report that nothing has changed this year. In fact, Norton has been coasting on old code for several years, simply dressing it up with an occasional new feature here and there. This year, Norton AntiVirus 2005 adds a limited firewall designed to block incoming worm code. I say, why not give us a full firewall instead? No, for that, you'll need to cough up another £44.99 for Norton Personal Firewall or go whole hog and get the £59.99 Norton Internet Security suite. Norton AntiVirus 2005 produces a perceptible resource drain -- you'd think they'd have fixed that by now. Worse, in order to completely remove Norton AntiVirus from your PC, you'll need to download a free tool from Symantec (follow the links in the 'Norton AntiVirus installed as a stand-alone product' section of the page).

McAfee VirusScan 9.0
I have similar complaints about McAfee's antivirus software. A few years ago, I switched from Norton to McAfee because McAfee VirusScan included a firewall with its antivirus program. Then the McAfee overseas technical support became a nightmare to work with via online chat. Now that McAfee is providing antivirus protection with new Dell computers and notebooks, McAfee has fixed its technical support woes, but it's since dropped its firewall feature from McAfee VirusScan 9.0. As with Norton AntiVirus, if you want a firewall with your McAfee antivirus program, you'll have to shell out £29.99 for McAfee Personal Firewall Plus or pay more for the McAfee Internet Security suite. McAfee VirusScan 9.0 also produces a noticeable resource drain and installs the McAfee Security Center, which not only reports whether your signature files are up-to-date, but also advertises McAfee and various partnered applications in little pop-up windows -- annoying.

Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security 12 (2005)
Last year, I awarded PC-cillin our 2004 Editors' Choice because Trend Micro included a firewall with its antivirus program and offered free technical support. I thought that was as good as it gets. Well, it just got even better. This year's version of Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security, our Editors' Choice for 2005, includes an antivirus scanner, a firewall, anti-spam and anti-spyware capabilities, plus parental controls -- and that's only the start. Trend Micro also added a wireless network monitor this year, allowing you to enable or deny wireless access for others to your network. And Trend made it possible to apply one set of security configuration rules across every computer on your home network (other programs require you to copy the configurations from machine to machine). Here's the clincher: PC-cillin costs the same as Norton's or McAfee's antivirus software. It also makes barely a dent in your system resources; when it's scanning, you'll hardly notice PC-cillin.

Why can't Norton and McAfee get it right?
When I see the annual updates for their antivirus programs, I'm always quick to ask: why should anyone update? In the case of Norton, Symantec requires an upgrade. Signature-file updates are available for only two years after a product's release. Thus, every three years or so you must upgrade to the latest version -- or switch to another antivirus application. Although McAfee's policy is not as draconian, it also eventually discontinues its updates, although not on a set schedule. I think everyone should periodically upgrade antivirus software to take advantage of the latest and greatest security features, but only if the vendor gives you better features from year to year. Within the antivirus market, Trend Micro is a distant third in terms of market share, but it deserves your attention. It's your £40, so why not get something worthwhile for your money?

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON
    Product Date Editors'
Rating
Readers'
Rating
 
 
 
    Product Date Editors'
Rating
Readers'
Rating

Did you find this article useful?
291 out of 347 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

86 comments

  1. What about AVG antivirus as a replacement for Nort... Anonymous
  2. I use AVG and sygate as an antivirus/firewall... Neil McLeish
  3. AVG is very good and it FREE!!! I use th... AVG_user
  4. The problem with AVG at the moment is version... Anonymous
  5. I am worried by all this discussion. There s... Stuart Holmes
  6. Don't know how old this post is but if y... Mashed Spuds
  7. Anybody else tried bitdefender? Fantastic all... Claire
  8. Norton sucks your system resources to the flo... Andrew Woodhead
  9. Norton is a memory hog that halts your w... Anonymous
  10. I already DID ditch Norton. On the recommenda... Anonymous
  11. I ditched it in 2003 after many years as norton us... Anonymous
  12. Funily enough i had been having problems with my N... James George
  13. Why pay at all? AVG AntiVirus is Free and so are t... Allan Burton
  14. because avg is the best you will not go wrong... paul
  15. Seriously people, AVG sucks balls, its about... Dan
  16. Norton surely sucks the computer speed davidraj
  17. Recently I tried to disinfect my slepson's PC. He... Alec Bowman
  18. Did you try an online virus scan from the Tre... Neil
  19. I should have read this before I tried to upgrade... Nicola Carr
  20. I'd have to agree with a number of posts abou... cyphon
  21. I've consistently used Norton and had NO problems... Grayson Walkter
  22. www.free-av.com FREE and it works a treat. www.syg... Rory Truman
  23. As someone who actually looks into anti virus soft... Dean
  24. Are you insane? Symantec and McAfee run by t... Mcafee man
  25. have you tried the eScan from MicroWorld... Mohammed
  26. We've been long time users and VARs... Craig Powell
  27. You only seem to review toys and not proper soluti... Anonymous
  28. Don't forget FREE Avast anti-virus. Its great for... John Rollins
  29. If you think Norton Antivirus is dire you should t... Toby Downes
  30. I've experienced my share of Norton horror. H... Ray Boyer
  31. Their after sales service is awful. I spent two we... bill greig
  32. We couldn't agree more. As an ISP in South Africa... Bill Keenan
  33. AVG let the viruses in time after time so don... Paul
  34. http://english.mks.com.pl/products-descriptio... LOkii
  35. In 2004 I have ditched Norton Anti-Virus Toolkit d... Colin
  36. Firewall: "Tiny Personal Firewall 2" (last freewar... Anonymous
  37. I ditch Norton Antivirus long time ago. Iam using... Pierre Benoist
  38. Av's ,Anti-Spy ,etc. that's all fine to me BU... Chris M .
  39. Your reviewer says: " ...latest viruses and w... Disgruntled
  40. I totally agree witheverything you say. I fin... pop
  41. Another Reason to ditch Norton - a Norton update/u... Anonymous
  42. I've a Norton user from the beginning but when i u... Tony
  43. Norton is out of the ballgame. Their antiviru... Anonymous
  44. avast its free and suppotts p2p, got to admit this... Anonymous
  45. forgot to mention it also scans your hard dri... Anonymous
  46. Have used Norton for several years and a... Anonymous
  47. Not sure how old this post is but i will post... Anonymous
  48. How many AV programs offer protection to us x64 us... G. Telford
  49. Why pay for something that slows your computer dow... Chris Carter
  50. Is PC-Cillin still extremely parasitic? i.e., hard... zombie
  51. Agree Norton is dreadful - have had horrendous pro... Anonymous
  52. I could not agree more. I got up this morning... Anonymous
  53. I have used Norton for several years, but I had a... Anonymous
  54. I used to use avg and have no complaints but made... Anonymous
  55. I have a big problem with Norton antivirus.... Anonymous
  56. Trying to install a security software update for N... Joe Donoghue
  57. I completely agree. I'm an IT professional an... Anonymous
  58. where is peter norton? Anonymous
  59. Peter Norton os dead, as is his software. As... Raymond A Jones
  60. On the 15 oct 2005 I tried to renew my Norton subs... Anonymous
  61. Im trying to get rid of my Norton Anti Virus.... Antony Rothwell
  62. I have managed to get rid of my Norton A... C.Beasley
  63. Purchased NAV 2006 in May 2006. In October I... Alex Csendes
  64. My computer got slower and slower. It started shu... Bruce Fisher
  65. I WANT TO GET RID OF NORTON ANTI VIRUS AND I UNIST... Anonymous
  66. There are a vast array of products and many of the... Matt Newnham
  67. I would have to agree with the poster concern... Simon Rolfe
  68. My purchase of NAV has caused nothing but problems... John Young
  69. the program is an absolutel nightmare if you have... john shearer
  70. We use Windows XP 64 Edition, with which Norton (n... Colin D Moon
  71. guys all the norton users are complaining about th... JHON
  72. pc-cillin used it for 4 yrs nuf sed brill ! Anonymous
  73. where to download free AVG antivirus version? Anonymous
  74. WE DO NOT RECOMMEND NORTON ANTIVIRUS! Because of... Jim Pro. Computer
  75. I recommend Solo Antivirus, especially if you're o... Anonymous
  76. I was fed up with Norton Antivirus window popping... Yvette Medworth
  77. I'm delighted to say that all my programs are back... Yvette Medworth
  78. Further to my last comments. I decided to agree t... Yvette Medworth
  79. I ditch Norton as soon as i see it on a pc. I'm do... Grame
  80. Norton (and others) scan OUTGOING email, this cann... Mick Haskell
  81. It does appear that it is impossible to turn... Petri
  82. I spend every renewal tryind to download for the n... stephen french
  83. Has anyone had any experience with Fsecure system?... Anonymous
  84. i have been with norton antivirus ever since i fir... Anonymous
  85. Norton davyjones
  86. BitDefender 10 basca

Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Campaigners criticise '£10bn NHS IT ov...

The National Health Service's flagship IT project has been criticised by a tax campaign group for running billions of pounds over budget. The NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT)... More

1 comment

Climate research centre compromised

One of the UK's leading climate change research centres has had a security breach. The Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (UEA) suffered a compromise of information,... More

1 comment

Government web-monitoring plans on hol...

Government plans to compel ISPs to process and store details of all web communications have been put on hold until after the next election. The Home Office told ZDNet UK on Wednesday... More

1 comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters