Join ZDNet's roundtable on datacentres
Friday 17 October 2003, 1:46 PM
After using Norton for years successfully I decided to try NAV 2004. What a diaster! It refused to register online and I couldn't go back to NAV 2003. it totally messed up my system. I will now purchase a competitor's software.
This Member's Rating
7.8NAV 2004 is still a good choice for first timers, but its minor improvements mean that NAV 2003 users need not upgrade.
£ 44
Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?
By: J.A. Watson
Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery
Check this out: http://blogs.msdn.com/e7...spx Its an official blog "Engineering Windows 7" Nothing. That's what is revealed. Until there is real... More
It didn't seem fair to wade into Microsoft's “Mojave Experiment” advert quite so soon after the flat earth incident. But The Economist has no such qualms: in this week's issue, it wonders... More
It's not all roses with Vista, of course. I had my first BSOD over the weekend, when I was turning the laptop back on after suspending it. They typical long blurb about "If this is... More
Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links
Previous
