ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Windows XP SP2 more secure? Not so fast

Robert Vamosi CNET

Published: 17 Aug 2004

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

It's late. It's large. But Microsoft's much heralded Windows XP Service Pack 2 has finally arrived. Right now, manufacturers and large-systems operators are getting their first look at the final version of SP2. By the end of August, automatic desktop downloads will be available via Windows Update, then on free CDs.

At first glance, the release suggests that Microsoft has finally become serious about upgrading Windows' security. But before you get too excited, let me take a moment to slice through some of the hype coming out of Redmond, Washington. When it comes to eliminating Internet threats, there's still a lot of work yet to be done -- both by Microsoft and by you and me.

Windows XP -- the second edition
Windows XP SP2's biggest news is the new Windows Security Center -- and it's about time. Now, from one location within Windows, complete with system-tray alert notifications, you can monitor whether your antivirus and firewall protection are enabled and whether Windows is up-to-date with the latest patches. Windows XP SP2 also improves its built-in firewall (now called Windows Firewall) and turns it on by default, blocks pop-ups and malicious code within Internet Explorer, and turns off HTML images (such as spam pornography) within Outlook Express.

Some XP SP2 changes are harder to see. Microsoft used this release to harden its operating system; in other words, Microsoft recompiled all its Windows system binaries to include a new flag, GS, which will mitigate buffer overflows, a common method used by criminal hackers (crackers) to overwrite legitimate code with malicious code on your PC. A buffer overflow is the method the Sasser worm used to infect PCs. Windows XP SP2 also makes important changes to core Windows components, such as DCOM and RPC (flaws within the DCOM RPC led to the damaging MSBlast attack last year). And SP2 will also bring every Windows XP system up-to-date, whether or not you've ever performed a Windows update post-install. Once you've installed SP2, you'll have SP1's updates plus all the security patches released up through MS04-025.

No more buffer overruns? Read the fine print
Are we all clear now, then? No need to worry about malicious attacks that take advantage of Windows weaknesses? Not so fast. To fully block the aforementioned buffer overflow and the Internet worms that feed on them you'll need to follow fine print: turns out the necessary No Execute (NX) setting isn't present in the current hardware architecture of most 64-bit and 32-bit processors on the market today. This Data Execution Prevention, or DEP, is currently available only on newer AMD and a handful of Intel's Itanium server chips. In other words, the new Windows DEP changes won't help you unless you're running XP SP2 on a machine with AMD or Intel Itanium processors. My colleague, David Berlind, has suggested that large companies looking to upgrade their hardware fleet should wait until after the first of the year, after Intel has released its chips.

For you and me, it's going to take even longer before this final layer of Microsoft data protection trickles down. Not everyone will upgrade their PCs based on the fact that these new chips won't execute malicious code, and unless you're particularly anxious about buffer overrun, the new security probably isn't a compelling enough reason to hold off purchasing a new desktop PC. In fact, you and I are likely to see good prices on the old chipsets as soon as the new DEP/NX chips hit the market early next year.

And, of course, pre-XP Windows operating systems still have a sizable share of the PC market and have numerous vulnerabilities that SP2 won't fix -- all targets for virus writers and script kiddies. It's going to take years for all the new hardware and software changes introduced to Windows XP to trickle down to the masses worldwide. In the meantime, I expect to see about the same level of virus-writing activity, if not more, as virus writers attempt to snag XP customers before they upgrade.

No more Internet worms? Read the fine print
And remember what I said above about the XP firewall? That it's new and improved? Well, I need to qualify that statement. Despite the firewall's improvements, it's not invincible. A month ago, I asked Fred Felmen, vice president of marketing for Zone Labs, what impact Windows XP SP2 might have on third-party firewalls such as Zone Labs' ZoneAlarm. He said the Microsoft firewall protects only against inbound threats, not outbound threats, such as keystroke-logging Trojans that report your passwords and credit card info to others. Also, the lack of outbound protection means your infected PC could still participate in distributed denial-of-service attacks. In short, I recommend keeping your third-party firewall enabled alongside Microsoft's. Two firewalls are better than one.

Finally, since we're talking about Microsoft software here, it's entirely possible that virus writers will soon write code that turns off the Windows Security Center, or at least leads it to falsify its status reports (saying, for instance, that a security measure is enabled when it's really not). So don't just rely on the Security Center's status messages. Periodically check your antivirus and firewall programs independently.

Some known issues with SP2
I'm not just paranoid. Numerous sources are now reporting that the Windows Security Center is misrepresenting Norton AntiVirus's status -- even after the antivirus program is enabled and freshly updated. Symantec is aware of the problem and says it will release a LiveUpdate shortly that should enable the program to better communicate with the Windows Security Center. Other than that, the SANS Institute has set up this forum to report real-world problems with Windows XP SP2. Luckily, so far, the issues involve slower boot times and sluggish Internet Explorer performance.

Microsoft has made significant progress towards remedying its past problems, but the company still falls far short of putting itself on the leading edge in PC security. Install Windows XP SP2 when you get the opportunity, but don't expect this one update to solve all your Internet security issues. To be safe, keep and maintain third-party antivirus and firewall programs.

Related articles

SP2's firewall is not good enough

Comment The latest Windows firewall is better than nothing - but I for one won't be relying on it [12 Aug 2004]

13 Talkbacks

Windows XP Service Pack 2

Review We recommend installing Windows XP SP2, but only after Microsoft has had a few weeks to work out the kinks. [12 Aug 2004]

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
37 out of 90 people found this useful


New Products

Acrobat 9 Pro Extended: a first look

Acrobat 9 Pro Extended: a first look

Adobe's Acrobat 9 document-creation software is adding dynamic features such as animation integration, dynamic maps, 256-bit encryption and improved forms.

What we know about Windows 7

What we know about Windows 7

Microsoft is remaining tight-lipped about the next version of Windows, due in late 2009 or early 2010: ZDNet.com's Redmond-watcher Mary Jo Foley summarises what we do know.

SQL Server 2008: a first look

SQL Server 2008: a first look

Microsoft has made some big promises for SQL Server 2008, a major update of its enterprise database product. Here's an outline of the key new features.

Internet Explorer 8 beta: a first look

Internet Explorer 8 beta: a first look

Can the latest version of Internet Explorer arrest its declining market share? We examine the first beta of IE8.

View all Previews

Featured Talkback

What was achieved there is recognised to be of fundamental importance to both winning the war (Churchill visited to say 'thank you' to them) and the development of the computer. Maybe Bill Gates doesn't want to support this museum because it underlines where electronic computing started i.e. here, not the U.S.

By: 1000103773

Read full story:
Bletchley Park faces bleak future

Sentry Posts Blog

Biometric devices. Do you need one?

When saying “biometrics” I am not thinking about law enforcement, AFIS systems, national ID and visa projects. I first think about personal solutions that will make my life easier.... More

1 comment

Barracuda launches counter-suit agains...

Court cases are never pleasant or simple. The ongoing battle between security companies Trend Micro and Barracuda Networks took a new twist on Wednesday, when Barracuda launched a counter-suit... More

Post a comment

Mobile Speed Demon: Wireless Surpasses...

Mobile Speed Demon: Wireless Surpasses Landline Author: Eric Everson, Founder MyMobiSafe.com As I look around my house and throughout my network of friends, I instantly realize... More

Post a comment