PDA prizefight: Palm OS 5 v Windows Mobile 2003
Published: 26 Feb 2004
Round 7: Multimedia
![]() |
For years, when it came to playing games, watching movies and listening to music, Pocket PCs outperformed Palm OS devices because the core Microsoft hardware included a relatively fast processor, a high-resolution (320 by 240 pixel) screen and digital audio capabilities. Indeed, the mobile version of Windows Media Player enabled audio and video playback right out of the box. |
Until the arrival of OS 5, Palm users mostly were stuck with slow processors, low-resolution screens and Apple II-quality audio. A few high-end Sony CLIE models changed all that before OS 5 arrived, but did so with proprietary tweaks to the operating system. Now Palm OS supports the same Intel XScale processors used in Pocket PCs, as well as 320-by-320-pixel (and higher) screens and MP3 playback courtesy of RealOne Mobile Player. In short, Palm OS has caught up with -- and, in cases such as screen resolution, surpassed -- Windows Mobile.
Yet not all Palm OS handhelds take advantage of these newly supported capabilities. The Zire 21, although it runs Palm OS 5.2.1, has only a low-resolution greyscale screen and rudimentary audio capabilities. Even the £149 (inc. VAT) Sony CLIE PEG-TJ25 doesn't have digital audio. All Pocket PCs, on the other hand, feature the same core capabilities they've had for years and now carry faster processors to boot. In fact, several third-party Windows Mobile media players enable you to view native MPEG movie files, no conversion required.
Full Talkback thread
25 comments
-
Nice try to award Palm OS 5 as the winner! I disag... JED -
First of all, the difficulty you describe in openi... Steve Hall -
At a time when PDAs are used for more than just ha... Anonymous -
I have used to both the Pocket PC and Palm systems... Anonymous -
In using both the pocket PC and Palm for a long ti... Bill Ayers -
I used the Palm OS for six years and loved it. I... Paul Alandt -
I disagree as well with the direction this article... Anonymous -
Actually, they *did* compare the two fairly a... Verne Arase -
absolutely agree with the article. being a user of... David T -
The PDA market is losing out to smartphones. It wo... shekhar -
Given a choice, I will opt for Palm just simply I... Michael Lee -
i think pocket pc is better than palm os ,especial... hock lam lee -
You seem to be comparing the Pocket PC out of the... Peter Freeth -
I notice reading previous comments that opini... Denis -
If you want a paper weight, or at least to blow so... James E. Freedle II -
I recently purchased a PDA. Before doing doing tha... Nightz -
Windows Explorer makes Windows Mobile the winner i... Erik -
I was genuinely pleased with my Palm PDA - Sony Cl... Anonymous -
Not only does this article not compare like with l... Anon -
I think the article is rather good, no favorites a... Marijan Franovic -
After looking carefully at current PDAs I bought a... Duncan Corps -
Its been 2 years since the day i had my first PDA... strayato hirzaki -
And this is not an OS comparison I think. What abo... Michael Elfial -
I owned an IPAQ for a year and it was replaced 3 t... Monty Green -
hmm i'm stuck, i have had my IPAQ 1940 for ne... Anonymous




















