PDA prizefight: Palm OS 5 v Windows Mobile 2003
Published: 26 Feb 2004
Round 2: Entering data
![]() |
Palm OS and Windows Mobile handhelds are very similar when it comes to capturing data on the fly. With nothing more than a plastic pen, you can enter information by tapping or writing on the screen. The tapping aspect is pretty much a draw -- an on-screen keyboard lets you 'type' letters, numbers, and symbols -- although on most Palm OS models, the keyboard consumes half the screen. |
With writing, disparities emerge. The Palm OS has long relied on Graffiti, a handwriting-recognition system primarily based on standard block characters. But with the release of Palm OS 5.2 came Graffiti 2.0, based on a more natural character set. For newcomers, it's simple to learn, but it's a major hassle for Graffiti veterans because it's so different from the old system.
Windows Mobile offers not one, not two, but three handwriting-recognition options. The first, Block Recognizer, is a letter-perfect clone of the original Graffiti, making for an easy transition from the Palm OS camp. The second, Letter Recognizer, is based on Communication Intelligence's Jot, which also was the basis for Graffiti 2.0. Finally, there's Transcriber, which allows you to write anywhere on the screen (rather than in a designated input area) and in cursive, no less. Transcriber works remarkably well, as long as you write fairly legibly.
The Windows Mobile keyboard, Block Recognizer, and Letter Recognizer are all virtual input areas, meaning they appear and disappear as needed. Most Palm OS devices come with a permanent Graffiti area that reduces screen space. But recent higher-end models, such as the PalmOne Tungsten T3 have virtual input areas, just like Windows Mobile. Nonetheless, you still get only one handwriting option instead of three, so Windows Mobile indisputably wins the round.
Full Talkback thread
25 comments
-
Nice try to award Palm OS 5 as the winner! I disag... JED -
First of all, the difficulty you describe in openi... Steve Hall -
At a time when PDAs are used for more than just ha... Anonymous -
I have used to both the Pocket PC and Palm systems... Anonymous -
In using both the pocket PC and Palm for a long ti... Bill Ayers -
I used the Palm OS for six years and loved it. I... Paul Alandt -
I disagree as well with the direction this article... Anonymous -
Actually, they *did* compare the two fairly a... Verne Arase -
absolutely agree with the article. being a user of... David T -
The PDA market is losing out to smartphones. It wo... shekhar -
Given a choice, I will opt for Palm just simply I... Michael Lee -
i think pocket pc is better than palm os ,especial... hock lam lee -
You seem to be comparing the Pocket PC out of the... Peter Freeth -
I notice reading previous comments that opini... Denis -
If you want a paper weight, or at least to blow so... James E. Freedle II -
I recently purchased a PDA. Before doing doing tha... Nightz -
Windows Explorer makes Windows Mobile the winner i... Erik -
I was genuinely pleased with my Palm PDA - Sony Cl... Anonymous -
Not only does this article not compare like with l... Anon -
I think the article is rather good, no favorites a... Marijan Franovic -
After looking carefully at current PDAs I bought a... Duncan Corps -
Its been 2 years since the day i had my first PDA... strayato hirzaki -
And this is not an OS comparison I think. What abo... Michael Elfial -
I owned an IPAQ for a year and it was replaced 3 t... Monty Green -
hmm i'm stuck, i have had my IPAQ 1940 for ne... Anonymous



















