Your biggest fan
Published: 13 Sep 2004
When I got around to building a computer recently, I was surprised how much time I spent dealing with one little factor: cooling. Of the four or so hours it took to put the system together, I spent about half of it wiring up fans and heatsinks and making sure they worked.
And for good reason: modern computers run hot, even when they're just standing still. While idling, the little AMD Athlon 64 CPU in my new machine runs at between 30 and 36 degrees Celsius (86 to 96 degrees Fahrenheit) and blows its exhaust beneath my desk. And under load, it gets much hotter, turning into a very expensive foot warmer. This is why a lot of the engineering that goes into a powerful notebook or desktop revolves around keeping these machines from melting.
I can't help but think that spending all this time and money on cooling is a little ridiculous. Building my own machine, I not only dole out a lot of cash to get a powerful chip and a power supply to run it, but now I'm spending extra on electricity to generate heat I don't want, as well as to run fans to suck that heat out of the case. If I had a bunch of these machines in an office and had to deal with air conditioning, I'd be paying for this excess power twice: once to create it, and again to cool the office back to a habitable temperature.
And did I mention the noise? Cooling the standard way -- by blowing air over heatsinks -- means running fans, and even quiet fans make noise. To quieten my new PC, I invested in a nice, sound-insulated case -- but I wouldn't have forked out the money if the machine were quiet to begin with.
There has to be a better way. In fact, there are two:
Check your fluids?
The first is to take cooling to the extreme: dump the VW Beetle-style air cooling, and go with a system that can extract more heat without making a racket. In other words, liquid-cool the thing -- just like a regular car.
Water cooling replaces the heatsink and fan traditionally attached to your CPU with a waterblock -- a plate to which you plumb a fluid line. You pump liquid through the block, where it picks up the CPU's heat, then to a radiator that cools down the water before it heads back to the CPU.
Obviously, a water-cooled system is more complex than a standard air-cooled model, which is why it's primarily the province of PC homebuilders and modifiers ('modders'), not to mention supercomputer manufacturers. But CPUs and graphics cards keep getting more powerful (i.e. hotter), so we're likely to see liquid cooling in mainstream systems too. In fact, the new dual-processor Apple Power Mac G5 has liquid cooling, while the Poweroid 1200 uses Zalman's fanless TNN 500A case. More mainstream liquid-cooled machines will follow.
Old tech is quiet tech
Here's the other way to kill the heat from desktops: just say no -- say no to fans; no to power you don't need; no to the whole death-spiral of power, heat, noise and expense. CNET (ZDNet's sister site) columnist Brian Cooley tells me he's been 'stuck at 1GHz' for a while now. His machines use older technology, and he's happy there. His CPUs don't have as many transistors or as high a density as the electronics in today's machines and, thus, run cooler -- without fans, without massive copper heatsinks and certainly without the Three Mile Island-style cooling towers I fear we're all going to end up with alongside our desks if things keep going the way they are now.
But Brian has simple needs. He's not a gamer, and his three-year-old technology runs Windows just fine, as well as handling all the audio editing he does in his job.
Me, I want it all: power and quiet. And I'm willing to put up with sweaty toes to get it.
Related articles
Poweroid 1200
Review If you need an almost-silent computer, then a PC built around the fanless Zalman TNN 500A case, such as the Poweroid 1200, is currently the state of the art. [26 Mar 2004]
Apple Power Mac G5
Review Whether it's the world's fastest PC is up for debate, but the Power Mac G5 certainly delivers top-notch performance for creative professionals and power users. [29 Oct 2003]
Did you find this article useful?
31 out of 58 people found this useful
