Dual core shoot-out: Intel versus AMD
Published: 03 Nov 2005
Test setup
This benchmark evaluation pits AMD's and Intel's entry-level dual core processors -- the Athlon 64 X2 3800+and Pentium D 820 respectively -- against one another. Performance results from each company's top-of-the-range model -- the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Pentium Extreme Edition (Pentium EE) 840 -- are also presented.
| Dual core CPUs on test | ||||
|
| ||||
| CPU | Athlon 64 X2 | Athlon 64 X2 | Pentium D | Pentium EE |
|
| ||||
| Model number | 3800+ | 4800+ | 820 | 840 |
| Transistors | 154m | 233m | 230m | 230m |
| Die size | 147mm2 | 199mm2 | 206mm2 | 206mm2 |
| Clock frequency | 2GHz | 2.4GHz | 2.8GHz | 3.2GHz |
| Fabrication process | 90nm | 90nm | 90nm | 90nm |
| Level 2 cache | 1MB | 2MB | 2MB | 2MB |
| Power consumption | 89W | 110W | 130W | 130W |
| Hyperthreading | no | no | no | yes |
|
| ||||
Operating conditions
Intel's dual core processors can only be used with newer motherboards: specifically, the Pentium D requires the Intel 945 or 955 chipets, while the Pentium EE 840 is restricted to motherboards with the 955 chipset. The situation with AMD's dual core chips is simpler, as AMD uses the existing Socket 939 architecture. However, not every Socket 939 motherboard is automatically dual-core-compatible, and a BIOS update may be needed before a board correctly recognises the CPU's two cores.
Power consumption
The new dual core processors consume between 89W (AMD) and 130W (Intel) of power. For users, however, it's more relevant to consider the power consumption of the entire system, which we determined using a Voltcraft Energy Monitor 3000.
| Test system specifications | ||
|
| ||
| Test system | AMD | Intel |
|
| ||
| Motherboard | Asus A8N SLI Deluxe | Asus P5WD2 Premium |
| Graphics card | MSI Geforce 6600GT | MSI Geforce 6600GT |
| Memory | 2x 512 MByte DDR400 (Corsair) | 2x 512 MByte DDR2-667 (Infineon) |
| Hard disk | Maxtor Maxline III 250GB | Maxtor Maxline III 250GB |
| Power supply | Antec Truepower 380Sp | Antec Truepower 380Sp |
| Operating system | Windows XP Professional SP2 | Windows XP Professional SP2 |
|
| ||
As the table below shows, the power consumption of the AMD-based dual core systems is relatively low. This is largely due to AMD's optimised 90nm SoI (Silicon on Insulator) chip production process, which minimises current leakage – and therefore heat output -- from transistors.
With the system sitting idle at the Windows Desktop, the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ uses the least power among all the dual core systems (107W). With AMD's power-saving Cool ' n ' Quiet mode activated, system power consumption even sinks below 100W, which makes the X2 3800+ particularly suitable for office use. The same cannot be said for Intel's dual core chips, the Pentium D 820 using 154W in Idle mode; unfortunately the Asus motherboard could not activate the Pentium D 820's power saving mode, so the high-end Pentium EE 840 delivers the lowest figure for the Intel dual core CPUs (145W) in this test.
Under full load, which was produced using CPU Stability Test 6.0, the high power consumption of the Intel systems compared to their AMD competition is clearly demonstrated. The most power-hungry system is the Pentium EE 840, which uses nearly 300W; even the entry-level Pentium D 820 consumes more power (245W) than AMD's high-end Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (195W). The clear winner here is AMD's entry-level X2 3800+, which uses only 162W.
| Power consumption of dual core CPU systems | ||||
|
| ||||
| CPU | Athlon 64 X2 | Athlon 64 X2 | Pentium D | Pentium EE |
|
| ||||
| Model number | 3800+ | 4800+ | 820 | 840 |
| Fabrication process | 90nm | 90nm | 90nm | 90nm |
| Idle | 107W | 118W | 154W | 175W |
| Idle plus power saving mode | 99W | 105W | n/a | 145W |
| Fully loaded | 162W | 195W | 245W | 296W |
|
| ||||

Full Talkback thread
14 comments
-
I hate all the adds on this site.
and I have big f... Donny -
Firefox:
adblock.mozdev.org Help for Danny -
Any current browser. I use IE and get no pop-ups.... Anonymous -
One point that almost all AMD vs Intel reviews are... Anonymous -
Help! Aren't we also comparing AMD 64 bit (Vi... Anonymous -
Opterons on Sun are very storng. john macentire -
Why do these reviews never provide numbers for the... Anonymous -
I likes the speed test thingy!
Also i lkes my... Anonymous -
Regarding the multimedia related tests in general... Panagiotis Issaris -
Thank you for this article. I am in the process of... cyber -
I have the top of the line amd and intel in front... Greg Meinholz -
I have started a poll on "Has Intel's New Chip Arc... Anonymous -
Luke, I am your father.. Jack Daniels -
by seing all the test above amd versus intel... belang_belonteng














