ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Processors Toolkit

Processor benchmarks: Intel versus AMD

Kai Schmerer ZDNet Germany

Published: 24 Aug 2004

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment


Conclusions

So, after performing many tests, which is the fastest CPU -- AMD's Athlon 64 or Intel's Pentium 4? The answer depends on which software you use: there is no clear winner here.

The Athlon 64 has an advantage with mainstream office and Internet applications, and 3D games. Meanwhile, the Pentium 4 can always score with optimised software -- particularly 3D and video rendering. The multitasking tests also show an advantage for Intel's Pentium 4.

The Athlon 64 has a clear advantage in terms of cost. Although AMD's and Intel's fastest chips are comparably priced, system costs are higher for Pentium 4-based PCs with DDR2 memory. The price difference between Athlon 3500+ and Pentium 4 550 systems is even larger, because the AMD chip costs $71 less than its Intel counterpart.

Post-purchase costs should not be ignored, either. A Pentium 4-based system uses 60 to 70 Watts more power when idling and up to 89 per cent more power relative to an Athlon 64 PC. For a household with a few computers, this may not add up to a significant cost saving, but for larger enterprises with several thousand PCs the sums will look completely different.

The Athlon also supports the NX feature, which offers protection from certain viruses in conjunction with Windows XP Service Pack 2. Intel has announced that the Pentium 4 is to support the NX feature later this year. The Athlon chips' 64-bit capability is currently no advantage, as 64-bit Windows XP isn't due to ship until 2005.

Next

Previous

1 ... 15 16 17


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
243 out of 389 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

48 comments

  1. Folks: The slide and the text don't match on all o... Larry Karnis
  2. Why do the Charts not match the review. I se... Anonymous
  3. Text and Graphics do match, you need to look... Nic
  4. This benchmark clearly shows that a chip... Anonymous
  5. The text and the charts are OK, the confusion... Jorge Espejo
  6. Folks: A lower score is BETTER on SOME of the... anon y. mous
  7. *" During my research in “silicon perfor... Ziggurat
  8. Great review! I appreciate the input as do others... Gene Dolan
  9. Good review, although I'd like to see a Visual C++... Tom Mason
  10. Strange how you hide the benchmarks from view unle... Andy Woudstra
  11. Whose computers are not needing to multitask all t... Anonymous
  12. Multi-tasking means USING multiple programs a... Anonymous
  13. >Whose computers are not needing to multitask... Anonymous
  14. The multi-tasking test is intersting to... Martin Hahnheuser
  15. FX53 is the fastest AMD workstation cpu. Anonymous
  16. Duo and Dual core offerings benefit greatly f... Pop3
  17. This review is clearly flawed. Chips that are cloc... Anonymous
  18. If you overclock a cpu, you may create imbala... Morten Bjoernsvik
  19. Just to confirm: some of the test metrics are 'big... Charles McLellan
  20. Hi, I have a AMD Athlon 2400 (2.0)ghz XP processor... Harjas
  21. NOTHING! depreciates faster than a computer.... Me
  22. lol, @Harjas: "Hi, I have a AMD Athlon 2400 (... Anonymous
  23. lol, @Harjas: "Hi, I have a AMD Athlon 2... Anonymous
  24. Harjas, it's nattural that the price of your... Farcau Pavel
  25. Although windows is not 64 bit, you can run 64bit... Morten Bjoernsvik
  26. how do those compare with the Apple G5? Anonymous
  27. AMD's Athlon 64 CPUs clearly outperform Intel's Pe... Ashwin V
  28. The article says the Prescott wins on apps that ar... Lefty
  29. Hi Folks: Just an observation here which is, that... john thomas
  30. There isn't a clear winner?? Bawhahaha...take a lo... Anonymous
  31. The time is giving us a very difficult decision in... Anonymous
  32. The Athlon chips' 64-bit capability is curren... Anonymous
  33. True, linux tests should be documented i... blopnuts
  34. does an amd 3000+ makes more noice while running j... Anonymous
  35. somebody ask if an amd 3000+ make more noise... Farcau Pavel
  36. Which one cost less? AMD Which one uses less powe... Amd and Intel owner
  37. This is a little off the topic but what is th... Anonymous
  38. I own two computers. An Intel Pentium 4: 3E GHz (P... Brandon Craig
  39. Hi Branden. As with A64's the raw cpu MHz of... Martin Hahnheuser
  40. Friends, During my research in... John
  41. for me, im conscious with the parts that i bought... peter lo
  42. Hi Peter A lot of folks seem to think that FS... Martin Hahnheuser
  43. Apply your techonogy to end suffering. Heck what b... centroweb
  44. "I own two computers. An Intel Pentium 4: 3E... Occulose
  45. to: Brandon Craig Pentium 4: 3E GHz (Pre... Marcus Aurelius
  46. Charts and text do match up. Read the Better/Wors... Jenny Wolfe
  47. Whats up with the cheesy memory in the Intel syste... Jeff M
  48. Further benchmarks t0minit

New Products

ecoquiet RM ONE 50: a first look

ecoquiet RM ONE 50: a first look

Intel is talking up its new Atom processor as a basis for low-cost, low-power 'Netbooks' and 'Nettops'. Here, we examine RM's education- focused ecoquiet ONE 50.

MSI Wind: a first look

MSI Wind: a first look

MSI is the latest to join the ranks of would-be ASUS Eee challengers. Here are our first impressions of the forthcoming 10in. Wind notebook.

Apple Time Capsule: a first look

Apple Time Capsule: a first look

With Time Capsule, Apple blends high-bandwidth wireless networking and automated system backup in one tidy-looking package.

Apple MacBook Air: a first look

Apple MacBook Air: a first look

The MacBook Air is not quite an ultraportable, but it is exceptionally thin. Retaining the same 13.3in. display as the current MacBook line, it tapers from 1.94cm thick to just 0.4cm. Apple calls it the 'world's thinnest notebook'.

View all Previews