ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Processors Toolkit

Pentium 4 v Athlon XP: conclusion

Kai Schmerer ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 16 May 2002

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Intel’s new 2,533MHz Pentium 4 with a 533MHz frontside bus is, barring a few exceptions, the fastest available processor for PC systems. However, the chip’s full performance potential is delivered only in combination with Rambus memory -- and you won’t find many such systems on the market, due to their relatively high price. A test using a chipset that supports both DDR memory and the 533MHz FSB, expected later this month, will make an interesting comparison with the Athlon XP.

Software manufacturers are likely to create ever more optimisations for the Pentium 4. The performance tests using Lightwave 7b and the DivX compression with Xmpeg certainly demonstrate the optimised P4’s potential performance advantage over the Athlon XP. However, if the majority of your workload is using simple office applications or surfing the Internet, then AMD’s Athlon XP is the better choice.

With 3D games, the Pentium 4 is slightly faster than the Athlon XP -- but this is hardly surprising as the fastest Athlon XP, the 2100+ model, is actually clocked at 1,733MHz, while the fastest Pentium 4 runs at 2,533MHz.

The Pentium 4 also offers a clear advantage over the Athlon XP in that the flagship 2,533MHz model uses 14 Watts less power than the Athlon XP/2100+ -- which, remember, is clocked at just 1,733MHz. This helps PC manufacturers, because the PC is easier to cool and requires a less hefty power supply, which should result in a quieter PC than an Athlon XP-based system. In many companies, a PC’s noise level is often more important than its CPU performance. In the retail market, where noise levels are perhaps less important, AMD’s Athlon XP should be the better choice –- especially given the much more favourable prices for AMD processors.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
8 out of 14 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

New Products

ecoquiet RM ONE 50: a first look

ecoquiet RM ONE 50: a first look

Intel is talking up its new Atom processor as a basis for low-cost, low-power 'Netbooks' and 'Nettops'. Here, we examine RM's education- focused ecoquiet ONE 50.

MSI Wind: a first look

MSI Wind: a first look

MSI is the latest to join the ranks of would-be ASUS Eee challengers. Here are our first impressions of the forthcoming 10in. Wind notebook.

Apple Time Capsule: a first look

Apple Time Capsule: a first look

With Time Capsule, Apple blends high-bandwidth wireless networking and automated system backup in one tidy-looking package.

Apple MacBook Air: a first look

Apple MacBook Air: a first look

The MacBook Air is not quite an ultraportable, but it is exceptionally thin. Retaining the same 13.3in. display as the current MacBook line, it tapers from 1.94cm thick to just 0.4cm. Apple calls it the 'world's thinnest notebook'.

View all Previews