ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Processors Toolkit

Pentium 4 v Athlon XP: Internet performance

Kai Schmerer ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 16 May 2002

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Web pages

When representing HTML pages, AMD’s Athlon XP has its nose in front. An Athlon XP/2000+ is already as fast as the Pentium 4/2533. With a performance difference of 43.5 percent between the fastest (Athlon/XP2100+) and slowest (Pentium 4/2000) processors, a CPU upgrade is particularly noticeable.


Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.05

The benefit of optimisation for the Pentium 4 is shown by the Acrobat Reader 5.05 test, in which the fastest AMD processor (Athlon XP/2100+) fails to beat even a Pentium 4/2200. This test also shows a large performance difference between fastest and slowest processors, at 80.1 percent. A CPU upgrade is worthwhile with this application.


XML pages

The fastest Intel processors just about grab the top spot when rendering XML pages. Here the Pentium 4 profits above all from the faster 533MHz FSB frequency. With the 400MHz FSB, the Pentium 4/2400 is slightly slower than an Athlon XP/1800+.


JavaScript

Even the biggest AMD fans may be surprised that the Athlon XP/1800+ is faster than a Pentium 4/2533. But when compiling Internet pages with JavaScript, it’s true. The Athlon XP/2100+ renders JavaScript pages more than twice as fast as the Pentium 4/2000 with 256KB of Level 2 cache.


Flash

The Pentium 4/2533 with Rambus memory is the fastest at rendering Flash animations, but the Athlon XP/2100+ is faster than a Pentium 4/2200. This example shows the impact of main memory type: although the P4/2200 with Rambus is still in the top group, the same chip with DDR memory drops back behind the Athlon processors.


Shockwave

The difference in performance between the fastest and slowest processors is very small when rendering Shockwave animations. The difference between an Athlon XP/1800+ at 99.2fps and a Pentium 4/2533 and 102.9 fps will hardly be noticeable to most users.


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
16 out of 32 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

New Products

ecoquiet RM ONE 50: a first look

ecoquiet RM ONE 50: a first look

Intel is talking up its new Atom processor as a basis for low-cost, low-power 'Netbooks' and 'Nettops'. Here, we examine RM's education- focused ecoquiet ONE 50.

MSI Wind: a first look

MSI Wind: a first look

MSI is the latest to join the ranks of would-be ASUS Eee challengers. Here are our first impressions of the forthcoming 10in. Wind notebook.

Apple Time Capsule: a first look

Apple Time Capsule: a first look

With Time Capsule, Apple blends high-bandwidth wireless networking and automated system backup in one tidy-looking package.

Apple MacBook Air: a first look

Apple MacBook Air: a first look

The MacBook Air is not quite an ultraportable, but it is exceptionally thin. Retaining the same 13.3in. display as the current MacBook line, it tapers from 1.94cm thick to just 0.4cm. Apple calls it the 'world's thinnest notebook'.

View all Previews

Discussions

spookie spookie

Laptop wont boot up

Saturday 5 July 2008, 12:51 AM

2 posts
keithjones keithjones

Yahoo's incompetence

Saturday 5 July 2008, 12:42 AM

2 posts